Everything in Bloggeration

Influence Motivation Purpose Action Community Trust

Sunday, April 8, 2018

Superfights of the Century

When Facebook likely goes pay-to-play, I'm likely done with it. Probably weeks/months after the Zuck's congressional testimony. Sandberg all but said it: "When we (Facebook) get to that point, WE. OWN. YOU. #toobigtofail"
We should NOPEHARD out from that situation. Because SLAVERY is ILLEGAL.

Also, look at Conor there. No fights due to a fight. Wins the championships, gets the money, gets the women. Dana White gets jealous (all I can think of)- "Gotta book these fights, gotta run UFC, gotta kiss butts board and new ownership I SOLD OUT to. I'm bald, dang it! The ladies WONT love me looking like a goof! I gotta take out that rage! That boiling rage which raises my hormones... a-and makes me so bald! Hulk up! Take away EVERYONE'S fun! Take away their LIVELIHOODS! That will teach Conor! You don't mess with this guy! I wish I had more hair..." Conor reverses the baldie rage and goes into beardie rage. Probably thinks similar things too. Minus the baldie stuff. Who is right and who is wrong? Conor responding to something Dana probably gave the thumbs up to, which itself was a response to something which Conor had done earlier. (Looking for opportunities outside UFC much, Conor? - Low Tee Baldie!) Gotta get some of that Super Male Vitality.

Tuesday, June 6, 2017

Warriors Come Out and Play

People find it easier to follow the 'give up way' instead of the 'warrior way' simply because its easier. We will take the easiest path 99/100. One wants to go HARDCORE. Ninety-nine others left; some to say NO to the warrior way; some to feel lukewarm to the idea of the warrior way-- could they ever warm up?; others, yeah, they want the warrior way, but just can't bring themselves to do something about it. Was it civilization or its 'teachers' that could not put these people over the top? Was it the people themselves? 99% imperfection is a large mountain to overcome. We are far from a 'perfect civilization.' Are our teachers not meant to lift up these people from the depths? We know that societies sometimes give out anywhere from a few loaves of bread to a staggering amount of food stamps to their lowest classes. We know too that sometimes what little in life they did have was decided to be too much by the government in power.

Vast Active Living Information System

What is beauty in civilization? There is no beauty in killing your own. There is no beauty in giving your own a few loaves of bread. There is no beauty in giving your own a few hundred dollars in food stamps. Beauty is raising up a generation and generations that did better than yourself. Greco-Roman? Western? Islamic? Star Trek? Star Wars? Pop Culture? Are these beautiful things to think about in view of the Perfect Civilization?

Just trying to create the Perfect Civilization here.

Star Trek claimed to be the Perfect Civilization, or at least the next best thing. However, they had disintegrator rays, space madness and the red shirts still died left and right. Go for the next best thing when you're 'Perfect.' Except you've got a One World System and the only message you hear is: Our Red Shirts are fine. Space Madness can be cured. We need our phasers to defend against 'lesser cultures.' The only Red Shirt that was fine was Jonathan Goldsmith, Khan was created during a time of Earth Madness; our shields are set to deflect. "Islamic culture and society isn't the problem, but Western culture and society might be," is a common deflection. The Other Khan, Sadiq, Mayor of London, has used this as an example after the London Attacks. This deflects from the problem of Islamic Loser Terrorism.

This is neither Khan Noonien Singh OR Sadiq Khan; it was the closest available picture on short notice.

The Khans are an example of the super-soldier, from a time  when everything was considered 'fine.' Terrorism? Mohammed said that's fine, Islam being the House of Peace, non-muslims being the House of War. Sadiq Khan uses his position of power to deflect the 'Muslims are the problem' idea to 'The British are the problem' within the very heart of the British Empire. The British see it; they might want to fight it, but will be called racist or accused of being some other ist or ism. The people of Earth saw Khan Noonien Singh and further consolidated their twenty or so nations into the One World System. These systems are similarly using force to institute a new One World Civilization onto their respective peoples.

Gooble, gobble, one of us!

The Red Shirts still died, versus contact with that backwards cult of death the Federation thinks it can lift from the muck. Non-muslims are pressured into either forced servitude or outright conversion. Is it luck that one is a fictional universe? Is it fate the other is not? Do we create an Amish Way of Life to defend against this reality? Do we create a Warrior Way? What is THE WAY to help defend against the Civilization that wants to eat you up and spit you out? One out of One-hundred can only go so far. Add a third of those ninety-nine and you're starting to get somewhere. What will you do when you you've realized you might actually have had the best civilization all along? Not 'Perfect', but 'Best.' The Best you've got versus a beast which you can't comprehend. Will you develop a 'Warrior Way' within your civilization, or let it go any which way?


Friday, April 7, 2017

Trumper Thumper

What does Syria have that we want?

Russia's only legit friendly naval port in the Mediterranean. It would be difficult, though not impossible, for Russia to run operations in the semi-opened Black-Mediterranean Seas. This would stop them from operating in Syria and make them rethink their bullying of Turkey into opening the Bosphorus.
Russian Navy
Russian naval facility in Tartus
Russia starts expansion of naval base in Syria?
Russian warships and naval assets sailing through Bosphorus strait has Turkey frightened

They're the center for ISIS. They wont go away; even more likely to go the OBL route early on, living in caves, constantly on the run. They'll still attack, much like the ghost of Al-Qaeda.
Raqqa, the ISIS Capital
Geography of Syria (Show me the Caves.)

 Al-Qaeda is here too. See: ISIS, as previously mentioned. History is a wheel. Does this sound familiar, feel familiar? YUGE.

They surely have sand, and some water. They have some oil. Here is where it gets difficult with people. We're just bombing the living crap out of Syria for the oil, just like we did with Iraq, they will say, we can't force those poor people to sell their oil to us for pennies on the dollar! Where were you when oil prices were driven to dang-near all-time lows when ISIS was in control of the oil? In your SUV, waiting in line for dollar-a-gallon gas? The Great Morenco and the Sexy Weiner Machine This tells you some of what you need to know. You must RESEARCH and DECIDE FOR YOURSELF based on the remainder of the FACTS. YUGE.

A West-friendly Syria gives Israel a buffer zone against the Arab World that wants them dead. Israel should be able to fend for themselves!, you chirp. They've proven several times before they can stand up and fight for themselves and WIN. They'd just like to know that somebody has their back if the situation gets a little too tough. America stepped up and became Israel's wing man. That's part of the reason why Radical Islamic Terrorists call us the Great Satan and Israel the Little Satan. Is it so bad to like to see somebody get ahead in life through hard work and determination to live? EIB Update: Egypt and Middle East Tensions 9.10.2011 YUGE.

The recent U.S. bombing of Syria is a direct effect of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama's pay-to-play oil pipeline scam. We will be suffering the effects of the Clinton, Obama and other potentially dumb regimes for years to come.

Saturday, February 4, 2017

Executive Shit Post Is Real

From Facebook:
Shit rolls downhill. Everything the Federals feel they don't need to control either by need or law, gets sent to the States. The States operate the same way as the Federal level. They may get a gut feeling that the Counties can handle something that they don't need to handle themselves. The Counties operate in a manner similar to that of the States. They will pass control over to the Cities. Is it a surprise that the Cities operate in a familiar fashion to those above? Nope. They finally pass certain powers, abilities and rights all the other institutions believed that they didn't need on to the people they belonged to in the first place. Look up the hill. Who is there? Shit doesn't know the difference between conservatives and liberals and their stupid thoughts. It just knows two things: It needs out and it needs to smack whoever is at the bottom of the hill. The Shit doesn't care who it strikes, just that it strikes that person or thing. The hill gives a strategic advantage for Shit-flinging. Remove the hill and the shit-flingers are on your level. Do we have to remove the hill to avoid the shit-flinging? There's a lot of open space out there, lots of hills too. Should we take all effort to avoid the Shit? Certainly, we don't want to get tainted up with the waste. Don't put the Shit-flingers up on the hill anymore. If you want Shit, you'll certainly deal with your own. It doesn't hurt to have an industrial strength plunger or bulldozer or water pump ready.

Friday, November 18, 2016

The Test TTS Cast Didn't Work

TTS - Text-to-Speech. I'm not doing that anymore. Stuff isn't even cheap!

Sunday, November 13, 2016

Future Thoughts on Present Events

More from Facebook:

     History is written from the future. At present, this is the present. If we are proven to be wrong at some point in future history, then so be it. Future Winners write the past history. Winning is definitely good, but perhaps not as important to giving start to a change in the way things are going. We don't know the future; we will say this position or that position will be the best position for America, Australia or the World. The only position is now. What is happening now is not right on many levels, if you're on the left or right. In 1944 we had WINNERS who put their lives on the line. 2016 we have bronies who need to have a 'Participation Trophy' for their vote for Harambe or being rioters. However, you can't have a left wing without a right wing. Flap, flap. Most people will come together, a few die-hards to left or right thinking will do their own thing on the spectrum. The cool thing about that is we can let that happen and call it out for what it is. I'd rather not have bronies or harambe bros; I'd rather have HARDCORE AMERICANS, AUSTRALIANS or any other person than those types. I'm no fascist, no nazi, no Hitler, I believe I've proven that already. I have faith in humanity, in the future. I wouldn't know if someone were a brony or a Harambist unless it was blatantly obvious. I probably wouldn't ask if it wasn't. If they are Future Winners, then good for them. They stuck to what they believed in and let it at that. I would hope that it would go the same for both left and right. The truly most malicious instrument of hatred is humanity. Be better than the right or the left, they'll sway and rule you, one way or the other.

     We learn from what is happening now. When things start going wrong, the start of the wrong is already past, like the riots. Trump won, Hillary lost. Now she and George Soros have gotten together and sent her minions out to riot. The trouble started when Hillary was not indicted by Comey back in July. We can't travel through time and force Comey to indict on that overwhelming evidence. We can't travel through time and stop Hitler. This is history we LEARNED the HARD WAY. Ease and simplicity, humans want these things. We can't have them, because we keep learning the hard way. We're afraid of having faith in a positive future because we don't do the things we need to do to survive efficiently as a society. We're afraid because we don't have long on this earth to bring about the change we think is necessary for our lives and others. Some have lost faith in themselves to be instruments for change one way or the other, veering off into some ist or ism that makes effort only enough to exist at that moment. This is historical worthlessness. Why shouldn't we learn from that? That what each individual does to move society forward in a meaningful way has importance. The left-winged monster cannot do that. The right-winged monster cannot do that. The whole creature that is humanity can change, without taking any unnatural losses. Have faith in humanity. Have faith in the future. Have faith in Jesus Christ. This is the change we can learn about, to believe in.

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

Trumpsmarts, Light Predicting and the Electoral College

     I have a feeling Trump will make some good decisions. People will want to hate him, like the never trump crowd and those still getting funding from the DNC/Soros etc. It will go so long as he is president. I believe there is throwback to 1980 and Ronald Reagan. Trump is no Reagan, but I believe he will be the next best thing since Reagan. He's not the smartest man politically, not even a politician!, but he can clearly recognize that in people. He will use those smarts learned in business to help surround himself in the know about the political things.

     He's not a stupid man. I believe what he will do is likely to be more positive than negative. I'm coming more to the belief that Bill Clinton, Bush43 and Obama have taken the term 'American Experiment' literally; they've run their experiments on the people, those same people being somewhat willing participants. The American people were saying in this election: We want more solutions to our problems than experiments with them, where those experiments may make our problems worse. I don't believe any president or political leader can get fully away from running experiments. Trump's plan to fix the inner cities is a good example. Urban homesteading, economic influx, school choice, building projects: He is telling them: I want to help lift you up, so you don't have to be down any longer.

     I'm torn on the electoral college. It ensures each state has a say. At the same time, it does take away that popular vote feeling. You may have voted for the popular candidate (Hillary) only to see her lose. However, if it were to happen more than five times in fifty-eight tries, many would say change it. There is never enough momentum to make a switch to popular vote or something such as first past the post, simply because it doesn't happen enough. It doesn't happen enough because the electoral college system is actually working the way it is supposed to if one goes by the numbers. With what system do you replace this method of voting which is not broken? If it's not broke, do you 'fix it' until it's broken?