Future Media, Present Questions

What would happen if the internet some way, some how, splits itself up? One side free and open and wide-ranging with thought and discussion. Free of price for lower-income users, however providing great content across the board/s. The other, shut down, closed behind a thousand paywalls. Totally internet-locked and blocked from the other. I have seen reports that the government some day, some how, wants to charge for old-fashioned snail mail. I have read that the USPS could charge $50-100 a WEEK and still lose money. I have heard a similar number provided for EMAILS. $800 a month for all the 'precious' 'information' that facebook wants to control for you, or freedom of what you get to read, who you get to associate with, et cetera? How will Alex Jones become re-personed? How de-personing even possible in this day and age? No person has that right. No corporation should have that right. Even a person like Richard Spencer getting kicked off from MasterCard and PayPal is not right. I'll denounce Spencer and Jones ALL DAY, EVERY DAY, but still wind up saying that their situations aren't right.

The media will get rid of Trump QUICKLY as soon as they stop reporting on him. They could do that, but at that point, wouldn't that start to get to the point of de-personing? Deperson and deplatform the LEADER OF THE FREE (there it is again, FREE) WORLD would not look good on CNN OR FOX OR MSNBC OR ANYONE. The government IS INVOLVED in the media. It's not all Trumpoids in there pulling strings and flipping through gears either. There's equally some Obama, Bush 43, Clinton, Bush 41 and Reagan people involved. Should we ban them from social media once their term is finished? Should we topple their statues, burn their libraries, or desecrate their graves so the social justice warriors rest 'peacefully' for once in their lives? Would they go to Internet Free or Internet YouBook? You know where each one of them would go, forty-five times over.

The media, as publishers, still haven't paid me for all the hits and good content I've given them. Balanced, maybe, without fairness to its producers. We could unionize, but if the media would go so far as to ridicule our associations to people and organizations; to claim that you are a horrible non-person and should not associate with others in ANY manner, how would this help? 'We gave up on monetization and everything before, but NOW we want what is owed.' 'We can't unionize because we don't adhere to far-left beliefs. No organization will support us, nor can we securely create our own organization under threat of de-personing and de-monitization.' The absolute right to be ALIVE. To be FREE.

Information IS FREE. You aren't being charged by either Facebook or myself to read this 'manifesto'. That would be nice... some day. But I'm just a small-time noob producer. I post public domain videos on YouTube and its alternative, BitChute. I make a few 'manifestos' every now and then. I share quite a number of dank memes. I make no money, yet I keep going at it. Why? I've been thinking about that lately. Probably because I'd like to see someone have a good time watching the movies, rather than being bored and miserable. To give a viewpoint on issues I'm concerned about. Not trying to be a jerk or anything, just trying to work my way through this in a mostly stream-of-conscious style. And dang it!, just to share a dank meme or an excellent shitpost!

Information is INSTANT on the Information Superhighway. We ride these waves and see others riding on them, wanting for their experience to be as well as ours. We ride these waves in SEARCH of TRUTH. No company or person can tell us which way it is. Only we can find it; you, me, Sargon, Richard Spencer, and Alex Jones. We're mostly still here right now. I just touched a spot of internet that Richard Spencer touched! Watch out! You're touching a spot Alex Jones touched! The Informational Waves don't flow like that. It doesn't matter if the information is good or bad. The waves FLOW over you, forcing you into a certain position. Use your mind to understand positive and negative information. Use your pointy finger to either confirm the information with a thumb up, or star or smiley emoji; to deny that information with a thumb down, down vote or angry emoji. Are these things real? Are YOU real?

Something, Something Media.

https://blogofthecourtier.com/2016/06/30/stupid-times-stupid-media/

I've said a lot about this on the twitters. Even more in comments while sharing this article across the social media, Facebook, Google Plus. This post started on Reddit and was only going to be a short paragraph or two. It has grown a bit to become... something. Media?

I ingest tons of media daily, but the bulk of it doesn't make me any more knowledgeable than when I started. A few well-placed articles, videos and books along the way bring me back to Reality Land. It is a place where I can think and grow, to feed myself in these letters and sounds and pictures. Each one of these letters, sounds and pictures are increasingly important as some have discovered.

Give yourself some space to figure out what is important among that which you've taken in. If you watch an Adam Sandler movie, you've just wasted an hour and a half. Fluff this!, you say, I'm going to emotionally binge-watch my favorite television series! You can at least bring yourself to write a decent paragraph to give the Sandler 'film' a negative review and that television series a positive review. At the very least, if you are partaking with anyone, let them know your thoughts. Maybe they'll be inspired to do what you did not.

If you are more serious, analyze the media as you go along. Plot lines, symbols, logical thought progression, production values. These are some things you can think about as you read and view media more closely. Are you going to believe Congress when they tell anyone else to 'shove it?' Would you believe them more if they told you to shove it? An example: Do you believe when Marvel and DC Comics tell you that their movies increase readership? If you said yes, you're wrong. Sales have generally been in a downward trend for much of the Big Screen Super-Hero explosion. What media wants you to believe and what really is out there in Reality Land are two different things.

I want to believe that media can do good, to right the ship. I want to believe in them for that, but I just can't do it. There may be some in the media complex that wish they could do something. I wish them nothing but best of luck. Will they succeed? No, they'll become burnt out after a while and quit, devoting their time something completely opposite and/or parallel to the media machines. Probably something, in any scenario, that would be easy to sell back.

In producing your own media, you may want to start into your media experience using an easy path, namely public domain materials. I'm using this method with The Televisual Experience. Public domain books are widely available; for review, analysis and maybe even a sequel. Public domain audio works are also available for similar purposes. Maybe you're a music producer looking for that sample that brings your track together? I see no harm in the usage of public domain materials, so long as the ultimate goal is your own media production. People keep telling you that you've got millions of cool ideas. Take one of them, put the ideas to paper; script it, build it, mold it-- there's your money-maker.

Magnificent.

I created this.

Doesn't that feel like a million bucks?

Debate Debacle

From the Depths of Facebook:

Either side of the Debate Debacle you're on, it still doesn't account for a few questions, or why Ted Cruz was given the HAND several times, or why Megyn Kelly mocked GOD then went right away to Cruz, who aside from Huckabee, has one of the more spiritual/religious backgrounds of those who were on the dais.

I'm not for Trump, but neither am I for the Trump bashing. YOU may be just as bad as Trump, calling him your silly names. Who should stoop to the levels of kidism and call names? Is your name in the Top Ten? Are you jealous that someone IS NOT smearing your name, depriving you of the kidism name-calling techniques you should probably forget about? Trump IS good at that sort of thing, he doesn't seem to deny it. The Rosie bit from a while back, which most of you jumped on (I include myself in that list); this spat with Megyn.

Jerkism should be met with a Proper Defense. A Defense against Jerks. This may mean that you jerk the jerks around. Use their own techniques against them. One hit was met with another. http://biblehub.com/genesis/3-16.htm

Who can you blame? If not Trump, then Kelly, If not Kelly, then God. As shown, there are numerous biblical references to the issues of blood. Among current events/scientific references, there could be the Ebola Outbreak, or the recent outbreaks of plague in Colorado and California. As SEEN, Kelly DID mock GOD. THERE is an issue I have with the debate. The open mockery of God. Maybe those who really study and understand these various issues put together the blood remarks earlier in the debate with the mocking of God. Are the differences between man and woman Trump's fault? If not Trump, then God? My real beef is with Megyn Kelly's attitude towards Ted Cruz, totally jerking him around by not letting him respond and the mockery of God, pointed towards him. Twenty-three percent of Trump supporters would agree with him, clearly. Are you paying attention to the issues of Ted Cruz and God? Is it really a coincidence that these two issues are biblical? Can you risk it if they are? Are you a jerk if they're not, or just dumb? (Riding the Social Justice bandwagon into the sunset.)

When Celebrityism Attacks Its Own Incarnations

I have seen video of this Drake trying to enter the Miami Heat locker room after their NBA Championship victory. Trying to mosey on into victory lane, riding high on the waves of his Musical Celebrityism. His high gain of Celebrityism was muted when informed that the locker room was open only to Media Celebrities; the approved reporters for various publications and teevee channels who are well-liked of the Heat and the general Sports Enthusiast Audience. They are the knowers of these Sports Celebrities. They chum around during the season, experiencing the highs and lows. They invest beyond normal means to get the story. I was there when Dwayne Wade, Chris Bosh and Lebron James made the important shots during the season. I was there to lift them up, during their moment of injury; helping to wave Media Celebrityism over the Sports Celebrityist in hopes of raising some Klout between the Sports Enthusiast Audience, along with other Sports and Media Celebrityists. This is the Klout of Celebrityism.

The Sports Celebrityist is thankful for the fans cheering him or her on. Thankful for the fans showing up, so as to pay for their often times outrageous salaries. The Sports Celebrityist gains nothing from the Sport Enthusiast Audience aside perhaps from a momentary adrenaline rush, the results upon the Sports Celebrityist being not always positive. That being said, the Sports Celebrityist has grown into some form of Emotional Vampire, sapping away such enthusiasm from the Sports Enthusiast Audience. One can see this from the riots that erupt after championship wins. The means of proper excitement and joy for the Sports Team has been sapped away. I must do something above and beyond my ordinary means, the Riotous Sports Enthusiast Audience says, I must participate in Riotous Sports Enthusiast Audience GroupThought.

Where does the Musical Celebrityist Drake come into this?

One- it is clear that not only outside of his Musical Celebrityism, he is a member of the Sports Enthusiast Audience's Celebrityist Chapter. This is not a bad thing; this portion of the Audience just happens to be Celebrityists. Big Whoop. A few bad things about it? One- see the video above. I am a Musical Celebrityist, Drake says, you must let me enter. Whereas the Media Celebrityist Door Checker may reply internally: Drake? No. I enjoy the Musical Celebrityist stylings of George Strait, Willie Nelson and the like. You, sir, are no George Strait or Willie Nelson. Replying to Drake as he did, he has confirmed himself as an upholder of the Sports and Media Celebrityists; as well, being a VERY MINIMALLY decent person.
Two- it confirms Drake as a terrible member of the Sports Enthusiast Audience by further confirming the Musical Celebrityism of his name, Drake, over any price of admittance to the Sports Celebrityist Games. He has used the emotion of the Music Enthusiast Audience to solicit funds to prop his Celebrityism up to a point where he says, I am Drake. I am a Musical Celebrityist who has lots and lots of money. If you grant me admittance, I will grant you a monetary wish. He has duped not only the Musical Enthusiast Audience, but he has also duped the Sports Enthusiast Audience (forcing eager payers out into the streets to potentially join in Riotous Sports Enthusiast Audience GroupThought Games);  he has duped the Sports Celebrityists in a similar fashion, since he has forced out members of the Sports Enthusiast Audience, the money-making catalyst); finally, he has Media Celebrityists somewhat duped, whereas Drake's thinking at the time was somewhere along the lines of: 'My Celebrityism MUST transcend ALL the ISM's. Therefore, I WILL gain entry into the Media Celebrityist's Celebration of the Sports Celebrityist's Games.'

Indeed, Drake has invoked a Holier-Than-Thou attitude within himself and almost certainly extending to his entourage. This should serve as a detriment to his career, however:

Celebrityism IS an umbrella over the WHOLE of Celebrityism. They may attack each other in a more covert manner such as this; or, in a more overt manner such as, say, Courtney Love and Madonna or Kelly Osbourne and Lady Gaga. More times than not, they'll make up like Drake, Lebron and Dwayne did later.

All in all, WE are the only true victims of Celebrityism.

Drake wonders: Why?