Future Media, Present Questions

What would happen if the internet some way, some how, splits itself up? One side free and open and wide-ranging with thought and discussion. Free of price for lower-income users, however providing great content across the board/s. The other, shut down, closed behind a thousand paywalls. Totally internet-locked and blocked from the other. I have seen reports that the government some day, some how, wants to charge for old-fashioned snail mail. I have read that the USPS could charge $50-100 a WEEK and still lose money. I have heard a similar number provided for EMAILS. $800 a month for all the 'precious' 'information' that facebook wants to control for you, or freedom of what you get to read, who you get to associate with, et cetera? How will Alex Jones become re-personed? How de-personing even possible in this day and age? No person has that right. No corporation should have that right. Even a person like Richard Spencer getting kicked off from MasterCard and PayPal is not right. I'll denounce Spencer and Jones ALL DAY, EVERY DAY, but still wind up saying that their situations aren't right.

The media will get rid of Trump QUICKLY as soon as they stop reporting on him. They could do that, but at that point, wouldn't that start to get to the point of de-personing? Deperson and deplatform the LEADER OF THE FREE (there it is again, FREE) WORLD would not look good on CNN OR FOX OR MSNBC OR ANYONE. The government IS INVOLVED in the media. It's not all Trumpoids in there pulling strings and flipping through gears either. There's equally some Obama, Bush 43, Clinton, Bush 41 and Reagan people involved. Should we ban them from social media once their term is finished? Should we topple their statues, burn their libraries, or desecrate their graves so the social justice warriors rest 'peacefully' for once in their lives? Would they go to Internet Free or Internet YouBook? You know where each one of them would go, forty-five times over.

The media, as publishers, still haven't paid me for all the hits and good content I've given them. Balanced, maybe, without fairness to its producers. We could unionize, but if the media would go so far as to ridicule our associations to people and organizations; to claim that you are a horrible non-person and should not associate with others in ANY manner, how would this help? 'We gave up on monetization and everything before, but NOW we want what is owed.' 'We can't unionize because we don't adhere to far-left beliefs. No organization will support us, nor can we securely create our own organization under threat of de-personing and de-monitization.' The absolute right to be ALIVE. To be FREE.

Information IS FREE. You aren't being charged by either Facebook or myself to read this 'manifesto'. That would be nice... some day. But I'm just a small-time noob producer. I post public domain videos on YouTube and its alternative, BitChute. I make a few 'manifestos' every now and then. I share quite a number of dank memes. I make no money, yet I keep going at it. Why? I've been thinking about that lately. Probably because I'd like to see someone have a good time watching the movies, rather than being bored and miserable. To give a viewpoint on issues I'm concerned about. Not trying to be a jerk or anything, just trying to work my way through this in a mostly stream-of-conscious style. And dang it!, just to share a dank meme or an excellent shitpost!

Information is INSTANT on the Information Superhighway. We ride these waves and see others riding on them, wanting for their experience to be as well as ours. We ride these waves in SEARCH of TRUTH. No company or person can tell us which way it is. Only we can find it; you, me, Sargon, Richard Spencer, and Alex Jones. We're mostly still here right now. I just touched a spot of internet that Richard Spencer touched! Watch out! You're touching a spot Alex Jones touched! The Informational Waves don't flow like that. It doesn't matter if the information is good or bad. The waves FLOW over you, forcing you into a certain position. Use your mind to understand positive and negative information. Use your pointy finger to either confirm the information with a thumb up, or star or smiley emoji; to deny that information with a thumb down, down vote or angry emoji. Are these things real? Are YOU real?

The IMPENDING DOOM OF PRESIDENT HITLER 2016

I'm seeing this too often. You weren't put on this earth to be liked; to have a popularity award given to you by every person ever; to be pressured into thinking the exact same thoughts as the next person. Saying such a thing is itself #Hitlerism. It is an ism, PLUS HITLER. Such an ism wasn't enough, you had to play the Hitler card into the equation. I believe those types wouldn't have done badly in Nazi Germany, nor would they do terribly in the Nazi States of America fantasy scenario playing in their brain matter. Add in rainbows, sparkles and unicorns to your own desire. EVERYONE I DON'T LIKE IS NOT HITLER. EVERYONE you DON'T LIKE IS NOT HITLER. In this political scenario, that would be the remaining 2016 POTUS Candidates. As said before, #Hitlerism is running STRONG in America right now. I don't like anyone in this race. Tough beans. I'M NOT HITLER BECAUSE I DON'T SUPPORT YOUR CANDIDATE. Is it going to be LITERAL Hitler in office come 2017? No. Is it going to be Metaphorical Hitler in office come 2017? Probably not, unless you count the Tea Party movement, #Americanism, Patriotism and every other thing GOOD THING to happen in America since FOREVER. That's the closest thing we've got that could come close to Nazism at this present moment. When did that do YOU wrong? You see the wrong candidate in the top spot and say: That is so wrong! Why can't it be Rand Paul or Mitt Romney or Jeb? Bush? An Elfin King. A two-time loser. A box of rocks. WHOOPS. I'm literally worse than Hitler now. Offense is everywhere and people are going on the defense. But the best defense is a better offense. But that makes me Hitler... really? Ask one of the remaining WWII vets if any one of the remaining candidates is worse than Hitler. I would bet that almost all of them say no. They fought against the REAL DEAL, HITLER HIMSELF. They came, they saw, they defeated the Hitlerism of their era. They didn't fight for their kids and grandkids to become little Hitlerists. Should they then say, I don't really like this grandkid of mine's decision, s/he is Hitler. If they're going around calling everyone they don't like Hitler, then yes. Hitler KNOWS Hitler. A similar scenario would be a demon calling another demon out from a possessed person. It just doesn't happen because essentially, the two demons are the same thing. Is it fear? Perhaps the candidate you don't like is threatening a more strict stance on something, for example, marijuana. Is that fear even enough to project the IMPENDING DOOM OF HITLER onto their supporter? Perhaps the candidate has a string of business failures, but otherwise is seemingly successful. Is that fear even enough to project the IMPENDING DOOM OF HITLER onto their supporter? I'm looking to Mitt Romney... why aren't people calling him and/or anyone he supports Hitler? I'm pretty sure he's had at least ONE failure in business and/or politics. Why not start calling Romney and those he supports Hitler? Now I can't be trusted though, because I'm WORSE THAN HITLER for even THINKING those THOUGHTS. It seems I can't go on, as I cannot be trusted, thinking out all the above for my own self. Hideous, nasty thoughts! I'm Hitler, or even worse, if that's possible from a dude like me. Remember that, kidzzz... ;)

A Christmas Debacle

...
Another thing I noticed, was all the CHRISTMAS HATRED coming from Christians this year.  It's based on pagan festivals an rituals, they say, I want to be right with the Lord, they continue.  If that really is the case, those people who HATE Christmas clearly must throw out the Old Testament (and much of the New Testament to boot), if not outright HATE IT, based on the fact it was ALL RITUAL, whether it be Jewish or pagan.  If the CHRISTMAS HATERS hate the rituals, why did God even send his only begotten Son?  Wasn't His shed blood and death on the cross supposed to be a covering for the sins of man?; that event itself being a ritual?  Our traditional Christmas is indeed placed atop that of numerous pagan festivals.  It was one of a few, if not the only, time a Christian was able to openly worship the Lord between persecutions.

The lone day where a Christian can tell their fellow citizens they're not as evil as they are made to look, and what more than strong faith do they have to show for it?  The RITUALS that the CHRISTMAS HATERS loathe are several months gone and to come.  Every other religion has something going for them that day, so why all the doom and gloom Christians?  Is it really true that the Kingdom of Heaven is here on Earth?  Do we need to persecute you harder?

Early Christians moved Christ's birthdate to December 25th, the biggest semi-unknown event from His life, the original date most likely being in mid-April.  That was the only event in that earliest church that could have sufficed.  And what better?  A celebration of the birth of Our Savior Jesus Christ, to bring joy into long-suffering Chritians' hearts; to show the Romans they weren't out to destroy the Empire; to show their persecutors that life was worth living in peace with each other, that they forgave their persecutors and welcomed a life beyond those torments.

The blanket HATRED/DENIAL of CHRISTMAS (or CHRIST'S MASS) does indeed deny Jesus Christ and the RITUALS PERFORMED BY HIM (Jesus Himself was not Christian, remember that.  He was an ultra liberal rabbi, who Himself was made into a RITUAL sacrifice object by the will of God the Father.  (A quick nugget of information.  If you can't call Him God or Jehova or Yehova or Yahweh or any of His names, that's creating an un-natural distance between you and Him.  It's not wrong, but it's not right to not acknowledge Him.)  Don't deny the day or the practice of Christmas, you are denying Christ when you do so.

Is it wrong to identify the pagan elements and remove them?  One answer, the Three Kings gave gifts to Christ, a pre-established PAGAN ELEMENT.  Another answer, Christ was born in a manger, among farm animals.  Zoning laws in nearly every area have some restrictions on farm animals.  You might be able to have a rogue area allow a pig or chicken every now and then.  But for many, they would face a fine and perhaps even eviction from the local secular government (PAGAN ELEMENT) had they allowed farm animals into their homes.  But they can have a tree!  (PAGAN ELEMENT?  Probably.)  Saint Nicholas (aka SANTA CLAUS) helped establish the core of Christian Canon, that is, that which is contained within the Bible, how it is taught and preached; the core kernel of BEING CHRISTIAN.  Saint Nicholas gave his first gifts so that a group of young sisters would not have to live as prostitutes, thus saving them from a life of sin.  Neither reindeer or elves or a Mrs. Claus for that matter (PAGAN ELEMENTS) were involved in that mission, or any of his missions.  There's a few starting points.

CHRISTMAS HATERS have a Snowball of Doubt that is turning into an Avalanche of Denial.  We all know where that leads to...

Please, continue to celebrate Christmas.  Don't be a HATER, they're just misinformed as to the true Purpose of Christmas.

Denial: DENIED!
Hatred: DENIED!


Tim Munn
12.28.2012
>:[


Holy Bible: King James Version

The KJV Study Bible (Bonded Leather) (King James Bible)