Debate Debacle

From the Depths of Facebook:

Either side of the Debate Debacle you're on, it still doesn't account for a few questions, or why Ted Cruz was given the HAND several times, or why Megyn Kelly mocked GOD then went right away to Cruz, who aside from Huckabee, has one of the more spiritual/religious backgrounds of those who were on the dais.

I'm not for Trump, but neither am I for the Trump bashing. YOU may be just as bad as Trump, calling him your silly names. Who should stoop to the levels of kidism and call names? Is your name in the Top Ten? Are you jealous that someone IS NOT smearing your name, depriving you of the kidism name-calling techniques you should probably forget about? Trump IS good at that sort of thing, he doesn't seem to deny it. The Rosie bit from a while back, which most of you jumped on (I include myself in that list); this spat with Megyn.

Jerkism should be met with a Proper Defense. A Defense against Jerks. This may mean that you jerk the jerks around. Use their own techniques against them. One hit was met with another. http://biblehub.com/genesis/3-16.htm

Who can you blame? If not Trump, then Kelly, If not Kelly, then God. As shown, there are numerous biblical references to the issues of blood. Among current events/scientific references, there could be the Ebola Outbreak, or the recent outbreaks of plague in Colorado and California. As SEEN, Kelly DID mock GOD. THERE is an issue I have with the debate. The open mockery of God. Maybe those who really study and understand these various issues put together the blood remarks earlier in the debate with the mocking of God. Are the differences between man and woman Trump's fault? If not Trump, then God? My real beef is with Megyn Kelly's attitude towards Ted Cruz, totally jerking him around by not letting him respond and the mockery of God, pointed towards him. Twenty-three percent of Trump supporters would agree with him, clearly. Are you paying attention to the issues of Ted Cruz and God? Is it really a coincidence that these two issues are biblical? Can you risk it if they are? Are you a jerk if they're not, or just dumb? (Riding the Social Justice bandwagon into the sunset.)

Life, Liberty... and Entities?

Thanks to internet and places like Youtube I've seen UK gun debacle. No freedom to do what the gun owner likes; everything has to be put in fanciful records form, down to the very last grain. Inspectors are like, 'why even try?' General response: 'I have a right to be happy and do the things my forefathers before me for several generations loved doing.' -'thats just an old-fashioned concept!' - 'happiness and being free to make your own choices aren't "old-fashioned" concepts.' - 'we will just agree to disagree.'

Nothing is moved forward, one way or the other. I don't have exact numbers, but I'm pretty sure non-gun related violence saw an extreme spike. I think it has gone down some, but is still terribly high for the overall population. They're using knives. If they can't use knives, use a brick or a rock. If you don't have those, you still have fists. Should knives, bricks, rocks and/or fists be banned? I've heard rumor UK might be going after larger knives, only rumor. What about rocks? The very first murder weapon! Why aren't rocks banned?! Bricks, that should be obvious. A ban on bricks is a ban on buildings, which is a ban on life. Ban the lives we have now! Live like neanderthals! Better yet, ban the future. Clearly, we've stepped up from rocks, spears, bow and arrow, swords and guns. Ban fatty foods because we might get fat, have a heart attack and die. Ban Facebook because someone's feelings may get hurt. Ban angry glares, someone might see them. Ban this and ban that that because we want someone to feel as miserable as us.

Who wants to ban things? What are these things? Why? These are general questions that should be asked, many times never brought up; at least, nothing meaningful. The two words that keep popping into my mind are 'unnatural control'. Law gives the playing field boundaries; it's pretty obvious people can't go around killing each other, that's out-of-bounds. Monarchs, Parliaments and Congresses; egos grown so large it is clear they know what is good for you, whereas you can clearly see and believe in what is good for you before your very eyes. 'The government knows what I want and what is good for me. I believe that, so must others I know and love.' An unnatural control to tell you what is good in life-- rather than believe in it for oneself-- and what others need to live an 'enriched' life as the government-sponsored entity has. Living the life of an entity, an organism that is just there to take up space, is not the life to live for anyone.