The Department of Rantology: One

Disney, wildly Anti-Semitic, didn't create the Muppets or Sesame Street- the first few seasons of which come with much stronger labels, and therefore likely to be memory holed one day- so those things, plus all the other things they didn't create themselves, like Star Wars and the Marvel Comics + Cinematic Universe, are HIGHLY OFFENSIVE things. In Disney's eyes, they should be SHUNNED IMMEDIATELY... unless there is money to be made. BUY NOW BEFORE WE PUT ALL THE THINGS YOU ENJOY INTO THE MEMORY VAULT, FOREVER. Or, as we've seen with some movies- wink, wink- they will self-sabotage and blame YOU, THE CONSUMER for their complete lack of disregard for non-native Disney Products. (Buy the Mouse. The Mouse is good!) When Disney gets caught, that seems to be the reason behind some of these wildly POPULAR programs, like the Mandalorian and Wandavision. 'Folks, you've caught us in the act. We know that you really aren't stupid and want to show our appreciation for your smarts. Here are Popular Television Programs to consume. Because WE KNOW what you LIKE.' Then Disney goes and does it some more. Only this time they cancel the program or recast into total oblivion. I'm thinking of the Captain Marvel chick on the Corporate Mouse side and Gina Carano on the Mouse Insider 'Virus' side. Beyond these choices, WE KNOW such programing WILL FAIL with the Disney Model. It all goes back to: Buy the Mouse. The Mouse is good! The Core Fallback position. Disney could care less about any of the products they produce outside of the Mouse. I'd say either remember that with your next purchase, or boycott. But that's what DISNEY WANTS. The Mouse is STILL LOOSE. Poor copyright law keeps the Mouse going. Eighty percent of Disney Business is the Mouse and/or related product. Not Star Wars. Not Marvel. Disney has been noted to say they could shut them all down tomorrow and NOT LOSE MONEY, nor be emotionally affected. We need reform not just the fabled Section 230, but also in Copyright Law. Public Domain should fall somewhere between 1949 and 1977. It is currently at 1921, thanks to the Birth of the Mouse, in 1928. Copyright is renewable every twenty-eight years. The Mouse 1928, 1956, (1984), (2012), (2040). 1977 was the year the current copyright law was passed. There have been extensions given on the law, itself renewable every so often, like the copyright it defends, of various lengths, to get THE LAW in. To get the Mouse in. The Mouse should have went into Public Domain in 1984. I WONDER about 1984. WHAT do I WONDER about 1984? Why wasn't the Mouse put into the Public Domain Nursing Home. Disney's profits and business all together would dry up overnight. Do you trust the Law or do you trust the Mouse?

Ms. Babbitt

From https://www.reddit.com/r/Amishia/comments/kt0x25/will_there_be_justice_for_ashli_babbitt/

Watch the video if Styx hasn't been deplatformed yet.

An example of the similar mob rule we are headed into. These people, largely Antifa/Q-Larp/BLM/Proud Boys, lead by a similar mob rule as handed out by their masters. They've only let up if not only for the weather. As far as we know, in Ms. Babbitt's case, she was an innocent caught up in the mob. The rush of it all. Anyone could submit themselves to that feeling. It just so happened to be the wrong time.

"If she couldn't understand-" puts a basement level IQ onto her, rather unfairly. "Only I may know what's right for you," you may as well go on to say, becoming nanny to all those in attendance, and to half of all these United States. Nannies make sure the babies are well-fed and kept; educated in a good, yet basic manner, tucked in safely at night. Do nannies instill justice to babies? Certainly they can. So to the parent or overseer can instill justice to bad nannies. We don't get beaten when we quit or are fired from our jobs. Do you remember the last time you were beaten over such? I can't remember a time in my own personal life. We are usually fired or quit by pen, print-out, or a phone call. We don't need you anymore, nanny. 

I would go on to say, you served us well, but certain nannies have just plain served us. To China, to Russia, to the highest bidder. What we saw is neither a D or R specific case. One Nanny, two arms, two legs, two eyes, et cetera. What we saw is neither a D or R specific case. I've even just literally spelled it out for you in the previous few sentences. After decades of divisive politics, post-Kennedy and/or post-Reagan, this is what we get: One side wanting to overtake the other in the dominance hierarchy. We must shun this. But can we? The dominance hierarchy has been arond long before humans. Violence too. War, on the other hand, has been active in such movements when one said of the other: You got nice stuff. I want your nice stuff. If you can't give it, I'm going to take it. Forcibly. The one had a few more followers than the other, and instead of sticks or bones or stones to bonk and thwonk the other guys who had the nice stuff with, they had bow and arrow, spears, swords. Mothers and nannies on both sides wishing their husbands and employers well, not get bonked and thwonked upon the head to cause severe injury. They may even want him to get one last look at the children. Do either say, for the children? I would imagine they did, look where we're at today. And so goes a hundred generations and maybe a thousand more. We must shun all of this. All of what I know, all of what you know. We must reprogram. What do you or I want in? What do we want left by the wayside? Do we want power? To corrupt? To enhance? We must use caution though. One is not too far behind the other. It will overtake eventually. Why? Because we want it our own way. Nannies, mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles. Climb through all the degrees of separation until we get to governmental and international levels. An Inter-National Conspiracy, no doubt, and we all get to play the game, willing or not. Semi-irrational. Not stupid. Somewhat devoid of structured thinking. Void of most natural thought beyond eat, sleep, sex, happy, sad, shit, and piss. Mob rule and justice. I am for the quickest possible escape: To have the House and Senate drop their Twenty-Fifth Amendment or Impeachment shennanigans, and get to work on a real stimulus plan to help out our fellow Americans. Not $600 like McConnell wanted, or $2,000 like Schumer wanted, but the initial $4,000 that Trump himself wanted before the previous amounts. To let Trump abide at one of his golf courses (for a mere twelvish days), and likely live out the remainder of his years at Mar a Lago with Melania and Baron. In Peace.

Also, I ran for the Presidency in 2016 and 2020. I am likely to run again in 2024. Did I receive your vote in either of those elections? Let me know.

Amish

:)

Political Puppet Lockdown 2020

 From the Twitters (Thanks Jack (HEAVY SARCASM):

https://twitter.com/amish_man/status/1328054410879053827

Fear-Whore Big Gretch wHitler closes down Michigan. AGAIN.

I live in Michigan. We can't do three more weeks without the guaranteed outcome of No More China Virus. Small businesses are nearly dead, even with the injected stimulus monies. There have been continued shortages in the past few months.

Soon, our American flags, seeds for the garden, snow shovels, boots, shoes, and scarves will again be illegal. (They're not normally bunched together with the foodstuffs.) The Constitution guarantees basic rights of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

There is none of that in these lockdowns. Ask Doctor Fauci about here mentality during the Spanish Flu Epidemic. Ask him how the Romans escaped plague situations. Ask him how 14th Century Europe escaped the Plague. Could it have been vaccines? Herd immunity?

I've tweeted multiple times about it. Michigan's Lost Years. 2020, you've gotten a feeling of what we lived through 2002-2010. They were hard times. They are hard times. They're here. Again. It's not worth it, to live or do business here. Take it elsewhere.

There is no FREEDOM here in either situation. All I can do is call it like it is. Like I see it. Friends, strangers, family; these give me some grief over this. Amish, you're talking out of your ass! Or, don't be such a liar! Or, you need to live in it before you talk about it!

First: Anatomically Impossible.

Second: I am NOT a liar.

Third: I have lived in EVERY TIMEFRAME that I've existed within. Unfortunately, that does consist of these Lost Years, Volumes One AND Two.

As long as we have these state (Big Gretch wHitler) and local (Mayor What Do Mayor's Do Schor), whoops, how did I forget Mister Cognitive Decline 2020 Hidin Joe Biden, National Rulers over health care (ObidenCare), we will NEVER come out of the GREAY CHINA VIRUS SCARE.

I mean, they stole an election, Joe; cancelled any lawsuits contesting the election, wHitler; done nothing, because by his own admission, doesn't know how to do his job, Schor. Two-thirds of that Triple Threat we've been living with since ~2018.

2009-10 were the last of the Lost Years. What brought us out was another political outsider, Kill Em With Kindness Rick Snyder. Much like Trump and the American People, Snyder had trust in Michiganders. Sure, we've got Flint's dirty water problem-

(Hint: If you live EAST of the MISSISSIPPI RIVER, YOUR TOWN has a dirty water problem.) Look to where the Flint water problems came from: Detroit. Why? Decades of Democratic Party Rule. Because we (the Democrats) have the telephones and pens and executive orders.

You could put at the end of the sentence: WITH GREAT LOVE AND APPRECIATION, OBIDEN (the OBIDENATON of DESOLATION). They wouldn't be wrong calling that a sick and twisted way in which they show their 'love.'

For some of us, the election was about whether or not we wanted to live or die. Democracies die kicking and screaming. The Lord willing, it will have been 250 years in 2026. Democracies have a lifespan of 250-300 years, if if the Democratic society becomes stagnated.

The Letter Man says Trust the Plan. I see the Plan breaking down. A Prophet, Kim Clement, prophecied general success for the Letter Man, and more with other variations of Letter Men and Women. All this, provided the LORD decided to tarry a while.

Where is the success in the breakdown lane? What constitutes success in such a place?

You could Vote #Amish in 2024. I'm running, again. Amish, that's CRAZY TALK again! Is it? Would you VOTE for me? Would you REMEMBER me? Or the PERSONALITY? Or the >\H/< behind my name?

https://twitter.com/i/status/1328142981770174467

Turn off the lights before you go home. Forever.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1328142991526129664

https://twitter.com/i/status/1328143004998262786

https://twitter.com/i/status/1328143021876146178

I had a WEIRD COMBINATION of these last two gifs running through my head. An oddly UNIQUE time in which we have TWO Presidents Roaming the Earth. Reaching out to TOUCH (and maybe get a little sniff of) SOMEONE. My current DREAD LEVELS will pass with STRONG #HFPPA.

I'm sure my #RESIST LEVELS will INCREASE along the way. Pray for each other. Pray for the States. Pray for the Country. Pray for our leaders. Imagined and otherwise. They are ALL in NEED. ;)

The Banned Jussie Smollett Twitter Thread

the juss

If I had been the one to report a FALSE hate crime, I'd be in PRISON by now. Follow the MONEY. Jussie clearly has it, clearly used it. Cleared his name with it.

Also, I find it a bit odd his lawyer was Mark Geragos, who just yesterday was hit with extortion trying to shake down Nike with Creepy Porn Lawyer.

creepy porn lawyer and giggle$ the mo$t

Jussie Smollett was going to be written off Empire. Some way, some how he got early wind of this information and was like, NOPE. He pays two Nigerian Princes, who had appeared as extras on several episodes, to fake the HATE crime. WITH A PERSONAL CHECK.

no personal checks

He lies about it for a while, before the state of Illinois finally decides to charge him. However, the state's attorney Kim Foxx has to recuse herself on grounds of personal contact with Smollett and his family.

it's okay jussie baby, you wont go to jail, honey...

He lawyers up with Geragos and his firm. He gives a not guilty plea despite MOUNTAINS OF EVIDENCE AGAINST HIM. (Personal check/s). Roughly two weeks out from his next court appearance, we get the Geragos news.

I know he doesn't directly represent Smollett, but it makes his underlings in the firm look awful. If he tries to shake companies like Nike down, why not those underlings too? Conveniently, the next day, TODAY, Smollett brought in for emergency court hearing.

...

Nike Logo Image unavailable (Thanks, creepy porn lawyer...)

Despite recusing herself, the state's attorney has decided to drop all charges against Smollett. I smell something fishy here. I then ate a sandwich and now my Frank #Qanon senses are tingling. The after-stench is terrible this early afternoon.

We KNOW Smollett is involved with money crimes. Rather stupid ones too. We KNOW state attorney has connection to Smollett family. We KNOW she mysteriously un-recused herself. We KNOW Chicago is notoriously CORRUPT. The evidence MUST be there. I'm sure of it.

Maybe Smollett, the attorneys, Geragos have something on the judge? How does an open and shut case of FALSE HATE CRIME AND REPORTING get shut down so quickly after it starts? If it were me, a dude without Smollett or Celebritist levels of MONEY, I'd already be in prison.

I KNOW Frank #Qanon gets the job done, for mere sandwiches. So, I guess I'm trying to drum up him and his supporters to run their own investigation into this growing madness.

Sandwiches = #Sustenance

Charlie Brown's Thanksgiving Kerfluffle

Millennials recently bashed ABC'S annual airing of 'A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving,' calling it out on racist grounds. As part of my research, I have used the now-semi-forgotten Journal of Cartoon Overanalyzations. In that research, I have learned that these allegations are NOT new, and have been around the past ten years, since at least Thanksgiving 2008. 

Look at this picture.

 

Seated at the head of the table, Linus Van Pelt. One of the more knowledgeable characters in the Peanuts series and Charlie Brown's best friend. He plays the role here of unofficial officiant of the dinner party. Seated to his left, Sally Brown, Charlie's sister who crushes on Linus. Next to her is seated her brother and main Peanuts character, Charlie Brown. I'm not an expert on fanciful dinner seating schemes, but I find it a natural choice for these first three choices from the character's perspective. Sally would want to be close to either Linus or Charlie. Charlie is in the role of safety net and Linus is goal.

Next to Charlie's left is seated Patricia 'Peppermint Patty' Reichardt. She has a similar crush on Chuck. Seated next to Patty on her left is Snoopy, Charlie's loyal dog. He has a rich and vibrant imagination for a dog. I think he gets it from interacting with Charlie, the rest of the Brown's, and their friends. As man's best friend he protects these children from non-family and any non-friend dangers. Seated to Snoopy's left, at the end of the table, is Marcie. Marcie is credited with no surname.  JCartAnal had more to say about relationships between some of the characters, especially Patty and Marcie. Knowing of the article, I believe in the protective nature of Snoopy's placement at the table. All are welcome at this table of thanks, even if they do us harm in the future. Come peaceably, truthfully, and faithfully to this table and you WILL NOT be turned away. This Thanksgiving special is about knowing your characters and knowing your audience. The characters are mostly placed before us. The audience comes after.

Ultimately, we have Franklin. Again, an uncredited surname. Who is Franklin? I don't believe he is a foe. I do believe Franklin is clearly a friend of the same level as the other children at the table. He has a unique advantage to view the seating and the relationships they bring to the table. Much the same as we the viewers have perspective of the WHOLE TABLE. What would Franklin's view be like from his perspective as an onlooker? I think it would be close to that of The Last Supper. Except, nobody is going to be crucified here. None of the viewers are expected to be crucifiers or to be crucified. It is Thanksgiving. A time to give thanks to our LORD and His FATHER in Heaven for what we have been given in our lives.

Thanks to 'Social Justice Warriors', again unnamed, we are now supposed to believe that Charlie Brown's Thanksgiving, his first with friends and people who are mostly not family, is a racist spectacle. We view this Thanksgiving program not only from our own perspectives, but also from Franklin's perspective. Instead of The Last Supper, what we view is The First Supper.  The first truly shared experience between the friends and potential significant others, if one has creative mind. Franklin was not forcibly added to the table. No law was needed to be passed to ensure his safety at the table. He came as a friend, reciprocating back the same peace, truth, and faithfulness. This special was produced in 1973, a time when America was coming off of horrific racial violence just a few years prior. The worst was over, but hardships remained, as they do today. Here we are, arguing whether or not Charlie Brown and the Peanuts gang are racists.

Were Charles Schulz, Bill Melendez, or Phil Roman racists? Charles 'Charlie Brown' Schulz ranges from definitely not, but would probably acknowledge SJW feels while maintaining the televised specials were different from the comic strip. I do believe he'd be more inclusive, adding more African-American characters, Native Americans, LGBT, etc. There is neither any evidence of racism from Melendez or Roman. Certainly they would have produced any 'modern-day'-type script from Schulz if the script was good and the characters workable. Know your characters, know your audience. We ALL have a table. Come peaceably, truthfully, and faithfully you WILL sit at this table. You WILL acquire the RIGHT SUSTENANCE and be FOREVER THANKFUL. Schulz believed in the goodness of people and Social justice Warrior Millennials can't believe he was trying to pull the covering from their eyes.

Future Media, Present Questions

What would happen if the internet some way, some how, splits itself up? One side free and open and wide-ranging with thought and discussion. Free of price for lower-income users, however providing great content across the board/s. The other, shut down, closed behind a thousand paywalls. Totally internet-locked and blocked from the other. I have seen reports that the government some day, some how, wants to charge for old-fashioned snail mail. I have read that the USPS could charge $50-100 a WEEK and still lose money. I have heard a similar number provided for EMAILS. $800 a month for all the 'precious' 'information' that facebook wants to control for you, or freedom of what you get to read, who you get to associate with, et cetera? How will Alex Jones become re-personed? How de-personing even possible in this day and age? No person has that right. No corporation should have that right. Even a person like Richard Spencer getting kicked off from MasterCard and PayPal is not right. I'll denounce Spencer and Jones ALL DAY, EVERY DAY, but still wind up saying that their situations aren't right.

The media will get rid of Trump QUICKLY as soon as they stop reporting on him. They could do that, but at that point, wouldn't that start to get to the point of de-personing? Deperson and deplatform the LEADER OF THE FREE (there it is again, FREE) WORLD would not look good on CNN OR FOX OR MSNBC OR ANYONE. The government IS INVOLVED in the media. It's not all Trumpoids in there pulling strings and flipping through gears either. There's equally some Obama, Bush 43, Clinton, Bush 41 and Reagan people involved. Should we ban them from social media once their term is finished? Should we topple their statues, burn their libraries, or desecrate their graves so the social justice warriors rest 'peacefully' for once in their lives? Would they go to Internet Free or Internet YouBook? You know where each one of them would go, forty-five times over.

The media, as publishers, still haven't paid me for all the hits and good content I've given them. Balanced, maybe, without fairness to its producers. We could unionize, but if the media would go so far as to ridicule our associations to people and organizations; to claim that you are a horrible non-person and should not associate with others in ANY manner, how would this help? 'We gave up on monetization and everything before, but NOW we want what is owed.' 'We can't unionize because we don't adhere to far-left beliefs. No organization will support us, nor can we securely create our own organization under threat of de-personing and de-monitization.' The absolute right to be ALIVE. To be FREE.

Information IS FREE. You aren't being charged by either Facebook or myself to read this 'manifesto'. That would be nice... some day. But I'm just a small-time noob producer. I post public domain videos on YouTube and its alternative, BitChute. I make a few 'manifestos' every now and then. I share quite a number of dank memes. I make no money, yet I keep going at it. Why? I've been thinking about that lately. Probably because I'd like to see someone have a good time watching the movies, rather than being bored and miserable. To give a viewpoint on issues I'm concerned about. Not trying to be a jerk or anything, just trying to work my way through this in a mostly stream-of-conscious style. And dang it!, just to share a dank meme or an excellent shitpost!

Information is INSTANT on the Information Superhighway. We ride these waves and see others riding on them, wanting for their experience to be as well as ours. We ride these waves in SEARCH of TRUTH. No company or person can tell us which way it is. Only we can find it; you, me, Sargon, Richard Spencer, and Alex Jones. We're mostly still here right now. I just touched a spot of internet that Richard Spencer touched! Watch out! You're touching a spot Alex Jones touched! The Informational Waves don't flow like that. It doesn't matter if the information is good or bad. The waves FLOW over you, forcing you into a certain position. Use your mind to understand positive and negative information. Use your pointy finger to either confirm the information with a thumb up, or star or smiley emoji; to deny that information with a thumb down, down vote or angry emoji. Are these things real? Are YOU real?

From ShitPoster.Club: The Ballad of Alternative Jones

Obama gave away the internet and this is only the first round of what we should expect. We are here on ShitPoster.Club for a reason. We see that Twitter and perhaps other gnustances are corrupted by Governments such as China, corrupted by their own lusts for power and fame, corrupted by businesses that have gained the secret label of TOO BIG TO FAIL. An example of this is Facebook. As you have read, indeed the numbers of TRUTH are out there, their growth at this very moment is next to zero. China will open up to them eventually. Apple could very well play role of mediator in the discussions. This event will prove the fact of COLLUSION between Apple/Facebook/YouTube/Google with China at a deeper level than just 'Oh, this is business in China. It's normal to do it this way.' China can deny it all they want, but once we let it get to this point, it is almost certainly far too late. China has infiltrated our media, our business. At least those that do business in China. Zuckerberg sold his soul for a few more followers. But it wasn't his soul, it was the souls of EVERY SINGLE FACEBOOK USER. I am not sure what this Vox Day is, but I have been calling for our own self-controlled media platforms for almost twenty years now. Write a blog post. Put a vlog up on BitChute. So on and so on. We are deeply within an unneeded MADNESS and this is an easy FIRST STEP towards SANITY.

http://everythinginbloggeration.blogspot.com/2018/08/jonesin-for-theory-alternative-media.html