Jonesin for a Theory, Alternative Media and a Personal Story

Jonesin' for a new theory.

On August 6th, 2018 Alex Jones website InfoWars.com was banned from Facebook, YouTube, Spotify, and iTunes. The kicker: He was de-platformed from all these services within the span of TWELVE HOURS.

I must admit that I'm not a fan of Alex Jones. I admit I believe in the 'Alex Jones is Bill Hicks' Theory. I admit to believing fluoride in the water is a bad thing. Does it turn frogs gay? No. Alex Jones believes Sandy Hook and Parkland either did not happen, or were false flags involving crisis actors. Alex Jones lifts his thumb, points his forefinger, says 'Bang!' Magically Special Counsel Robert Mueller drops over dead, killed by the magic bullet Alex Jones shat out his finger. It's definitely not right. It's also not right to not defend or be able to defend Alex Jones right to use such acts. It's not right to deny his right to claim, either in speech or writing, that Sandy Hook was ever a hoax. All speech is free speech whether we agree with it or not. Free speech and a bit of discernment from the listener/reader should weed out the crackpots like Jones from legitimate news sources and truth tellers. However, as has been seen with Mainstream News outlets such as MSNBC, CNN, New York Times, this is not always the case. Joe Scarborough, Don Lemon, and Sarah Jeong are laughing. The pressure is taken off from them. Alex Jones, the left's Wicked Witch of the Week, is dead. Well, it's more his InfoWars site, but you get our drift, don't you? We get the drift. Drift along, getting told all you know is wrong, never to be reconciled into their leftist thinking any which way you try. Plus, you'll be called a racist, misogynist scumbag to boot. Put on the other boot and walk away. No, RUN. There is no freedom on the left. No free speech. AT ANY COST. Alex Jones and InfoWars were literally the canary in the coal mine. How's the weather out there, birdie? *tweet*I haven't gone into the mines yet!*tweet* That's a scary thought: WE AREN'T THERE YET. 

Facebook has lost over $20 billion in the stock market recently. The Zuck can't get into China. Facebook is stuck at near-zero growth and has been for at least a few quarters. No China equals no growth equals stocks plummet equals FACEBOOK FAILS. Simple scenario. What better way to gain back some of that lost trust in the market, but to ban one of yours and the left's LARGEST enemies?

Apple recently went back INTO China. Do you know what they brought with them, as a bargaining chip with China? THE INTERNET. But not just any internet, the AMERICAN INTERNET. Why is Trump negotiating 'trade deals' which seem to not have anything to do with actual trade? Because he's trying to negotiate some level of control of the AMERICAN INTERNET back under American control. Ask yourself: How does a company gain enough POWER to take away something- and give it to CHINA- that under any other normal circumstance, only the AMERICAN GOVERNMENT legally and legitimately GIVE and TAKE?

YouTube? They'll demonetize and block and ban you for just about any reason outside of HARDCORE PROGRESSIVE THOUGHT. Spotify? Who knows? I honestly feel that this is an act of Collusion between Facebook, YouTube, Spotify, and Apple. I personally can't prove it. Just a feeling. A 'conspiracy theory' you could say. Better get your hats ready.

What do you think of my new hat?

"Facebook has a right to deny the publication of certain works."

They're burning our e books! Seriously, I think people would have caught on a couple of controversies back. You remember, the one where, at least in the case of Facebook, you don't actually own or have any right to the things you publish. From a dank meme of one's own creation, a snappy comeback, or even personal family pictures. Facebook owns it all.

That one got me rethinking Facebook. I'm not sure if Minds was a thing yet, but the controversy got me into thinking of alternatives to Facebook (Minds.com), Youtube (BitChute.com), and Twitter (ShitPoster.Club). I'm going to guess, off the top of my head, that it's pretty similar for Youtube and Twitter. Youtube I'm personally not worried about. I do post public domain movies up there. All I have to worry about on that end is copysquatters. Youtube has seemingly taken steps against the practice of copysquatting. Haven't seen too much there...

Twitter is another scenario. I'm being censored over there. Analytics evidence shows it. My numbers are down 80% since December. I've found using a trending hashtag helps. Some popular hashtags such as #qanon and #freealexjones among others recoup my losses. But I'm still bound up in the Alex Jones/Q Anon box. I'm tweeting a bit less this year than in previous years. 2016-17 feel down, but I'd have to check specific numbers. My drop in numbers isn't totally from burnout or laziness. No. The number of Conservatives, right-leaning Libertarians, general Republicans, and news/entertainment sources are dropping in an increasing number. Meanwhile left-leaning bots/socks and scam/fake news sites are on the rise. Leftists aren't growing much more in Twitter Population than those on the right, but the right is shrinking. This leads some, myself included, to feel as though the world of Twitter is shrinking into a leftist echo chamber. I've been targeted by some of these people. One attack was very tough. Over a hundred SJW trolls tried their hardest to demolish me on Twitter. I somehow confused the male and female genders with a made up word/s. I fought off those trolls with kindness. A link to Amish Friendship Bread recipe helped too. I was kind to them and followed each of them. It looks most blocked me, but a few still allow the follow, a few more followed back. I'm a bit worried about more thorough trolling. Maybe not doxxing, but other more nefarious methods. There are some evidences...

Superfights of the Century

When Facebook likely goes pay-to-play, I'm likely done with it. Probably weeks/months after the Zuck's congressional testimony. Sandberg all but said it: "When we (Facebook) get to that point, WE. OWN. YOU. #toobigtofail"
We should NOPEHARD out from that situation. Because SLAVERY is ILLEGAL.

Also, look at Conor there. No fights due to a fight. Wins the championships, gets the money, gets the women. Dana White gets jealous (all I can think of)- "Gotta book these fights, gotta run UFC, gotta kiss butts board and new ownership I SOLD OUT to. I'm bald, dang it! The ladies WONT love me looking like a goof! I gotta take out that rage! That boiling rage which raises my hormones... a-and makes me so bald! Hulk up! Take away EVERYONE'S fun! Take away their LIVELIHOODS! That will teach Conor! You don't mess with this guy! I wish I had more hair..." Conor reverses the baldie rage and goes into beardie rage. Probably thinks similar things too. Minus the baldie stuff. Who is right and who is wrong? Conor responding to something Dana probably gave the thumbs up to, which itself was a response to something which Conor had done earlier. (Looking for opportunities outside UFC much, Conor? - Low Tee Baldie!) Gotta get some of that Super Male Vitality.

Executive Shit Post Is Real

From Facebook:
Shit rolls downhill. Everything the Federals feel they don't need to control either by need or law, gets sent to the States. The States operate the same way as the Federal level. They may get a gut feeling that the Counties can handle something that they don't need to handle themselves. The Counties operate in a manner similar to that of the States. They will pass control over to the Cities. Is it a surprise that the Cities operate in a familiar fashion to those above? Nope. They finally pass certain powers, abilities and rights all the other institutions believed that they didn't need on to the people they belonged to in the first place. Look up the hill. Who is there? Shit doesn't know the difference between conservatives and liberals and their stupid thoughts. It just knows two things: It needs out and it needs to smack whoever is at the bottom of the hill. The Shit doesn't care who it strikes, just that it strikes that person or thing. The hill gives a strategic advantage for Shit-flinging. Remove the hill and the shit-flingers are on your level. Do we have to remove the hill to avoid the shit-flinging? There's a lot of open space out there, lots of hills too. Should we take all effort to avoid the Shit? Certainly, we don't want to get tainted up with the waste. Don't put the Shit-flingers up on the hill anymore. If you want Shit, you'll certainly deal with your own. It doesn't hurt to have an industrial strength plunger or bulldozer or water pump ready.